[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15852311#comment-15852311
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7669:
--------------------------------------------

It's not a single polygon crossing the date line here right?  (I think we check 
and prevent that).  But rather N polygons in a multi-polygon search, where 
their overall bounding box crosses the dateline.  I do think it is bad that we 
become so slow in this case?  Why should we penalize people searching around 
the Fiji islands :)

> Rectangle.fromPolygon could compute smaller bounding boxes
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7669
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7669
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7669.patch
>
>
> Currently it computes the smallest bounding box that does not cross the 
> dateline. However allowing to cross the dateline could allow to create 
> smaller bounding boxes. For instance, because of that, the bounding box of 
> the Russia polygon has a width of 360 longitude degrees. By allowing 
> rectangles that cross the dateline, we could get a polygon whose width is 
> only 171 longitude degrees. This is useful combined with LUCENE-7661 since it 
> means the grid would have higher resolution.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to