[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15854587#comment-15854587
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7673:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit c9c3fb489c822e0f46927167b39911e9ec7ac52a in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_6x from Tomas Fernandez Lobbe
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=c9c3fb4 ]

LUCENE-7673: Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for 
SortedNumericDocValues


> Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7673
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>            Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7673.patch
>
>
> Right now \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource can give a {{ValueSource}} 
> view of a {{NumericDocValues}} field. This Jira is to add 
> MultiValued\[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource that given a 
> {{SortedNumericSelector.Type}} can give a {{ValueSource}} view of a 
> {{SortedNumericDocValues}} field
> I considered instead of adding new classes an optional selector parameter to 
> the existing \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource, but I think adding 
> different classes makes a cleaner API and it’s clear that for MultiValued* 
> case, the selector is a mandatory parameter.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to