[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15860300#comment-15860300
 ] 

Mark Miller edited comment on SOLR-10109 at 2/9/17 10:11 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

This class is my old friend (5 years ago going by AutoCommitTest). I have 
dozens of tiny commits trying to straighten out it's odd wonders by simply 
pushing on timeout limits.

It's always been a fail happy test, though I think sometimes it's been better 
and other times worse. It's trying too hard to test shortish timings I think. 
It also looks like SOLR-10110 really made what was going on in this test even 
worse.

Anyway, for the last half a day I battled it from 40-50% fails in 30 to 1 fail 
in 30 to 1 fail in 60 to a couple fails in 200 until now when I've gotten out a 
few 200 run beastings with no fails.

Does not mean they don't exist, but I'm praying there is some improvement.
 


was (Author: [email protected]):
This class is my old friend. I have dozens of tiny commits trying to straighten 
out it's odd wonders by simplifying pushing on timeout limts.

It's always been a fail happy test, though I think sometimes it's been better 
and other times worse. It's trying too hard to test shortish timings I think. 
It also looks like SOLR-10110 really made what was going on in this test even 
worse.

Anyway, for the last half a day I battled it from 40-50% fails in 30 to 1 fail 
in 30 to 1 fail in 60 to a couple fails in 200 until now when I've gotten out a 
few 200 run beastings with no fails.

Does not mean they don't exist, but I'm praying there is some improvement.
 

> SoftAutoCommitTest is too fragile.
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10109
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10109
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Test
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Mark Miller
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>
> In my beast test runs it has failed 7% of the time, then 3% of the time, then 
> when I started using hardware with 8 cores instead of 16, 40% of the time 
> (unless something else also shifted). That gives it a test rating of 'screwy'.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to