[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15866013#comment-15866013
]
Mike Drob commented on SOLR-10006:
----------------------------------
Yea, I'm imagining the force option to indicate the operator saying "yes, I
know your checksums match and you think this is an unnecessary action, but do
it anyway." Maybe bypass the searcher, not totally clear on implementation
myself yet either.
The other open question to verify is whether you remembered to set the
SOLR-9836 property the latest time you ran the test. If not, maybe we should
have made that the default, I don't know. Regardless, we should still be able
to handle things gracefully.
> Cannot do a full sync (fetchindex) if the replica can't open a searcher
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10006
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10006
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Affects Versions: 5.3.1, 6.4
> Reporter: Erick Erickson
> Attachments: SOLR-10006.patch, SOLR-10006.patch, solr.log, solr.log
>
>
> Doing a full sync or fetchindex requires an open searcher and if you can't
> open the searcher those operations fail.
> For discussion. I've seen a situation in the field where a replica's index
> became corrupt. When the node was restarted, the replica tried to do a full
> sync but fails because the core can't open a searcher. The replica went into
> an endless sync/fail/sync cycle.
> I couldn't reproduce that exact scenario, but it's easy enough to get into a
> similar situation. Create a 2x2 collection and index some docs. Then stop one
> of the instances and go in and remove a couple of segments files and restart.
> The replica stays in the "down" state, fine so far.
> Manually issue a fetchindex. That fails because the replica can't open a
> searcher. Sure, issuing a fetchindex is abusive.... but I think it's the same
> underlying issue: why should we care about the state of a replica's current
> index when we're going to completely replace it anyway?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
