[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15897692#comment-15897692
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-7722:
---------------------------------------
Looking closer at BoostingQuery, I think the same effect could be had by using
a BooleanQuery and wrapping the 'suppressing' subquery with a negative-valued
BoostQuery? In addition, BoostingQuery has no tests that actually run the
query...
On reader-dependent DoubleValuesSource implementations, I think we need to add
something like a rewrite() function to make the dependancy explicit. Otherwise
you could have odd interactions with things like the QueryCache.
> Remove BoostedQuery
> -------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7722
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7722
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
>
> We already have FunctionScoreQuery, which is more flexible than BoostedQuery
> as it can combine scores in arbitrary ways and only requests scores on the
> underlying scorer if they are needed. So let's remove BoostedQuery?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]