[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901248#comment-15901248
 ] 

Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-7700:
-------------------------------------

Ok, that was a trivial regression:
{code}
--- a/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/MergePolicy.java
+++ b/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/MergePolicy.java
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ public abstract class MergePolicy {
     }

     final void setMergeThread(Thread owner) {
-      assert owner == null;
+      assert this.owner == null;
       this.owner = owner;
     }
   }
{code}

> Move throughput control and merge aborting out of IndexWriter's core?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7700
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7700
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Dawid Weiss
>            Assignee: Dawid Weiss
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7700.patch, LUCENE-7700.patch, LUCENE-7700.patch
>
>
> Here is a bit of a background:
> - I wanted to implement a custom merging strategy that would have a custom 
> i/o flow control (global),
> - currently, the CMS is tightly bound with a few classes -- MergeRateLimiter, 
> OneMerge, IndexWriter.
> Looking at the code it seems to me that everything with respect to I/O 
> control could be nicely pulled out into classes that explicitly control the 
> merging process, that is only MergePolicy and MergeScheduler. By default, one 
> could even run without any additional I/O accounting overhead (which is 
> currently in there, even if one doesn't use the CMS's throughput control).
> Such refactoring would also give a chance to nicely move things where they 
> belong -- job aborting into OneMerge (currently in RateLimiter), rate limiter 
> lifecycle bound to OneMerge (MergeScheduler could then use per-merge or 
> global accounting, as it pleases).
> Just a thought and some initial refactorings for discussion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to