2011/5/19 Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>: > Of course, for > certain apps that perf hit is justified, so probably we should make > this an option when populating field cache (ie, in-memory storage > option of using an FST vs using packed ints/byte[]). >
or should we actually try to have different fieldcacheimpls? I see all these missions to refactor the thing, which always fail. maybe thats because we have one huge monolithic implementation. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
