[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15906343#comment-15906343
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7738:
--------------------------------------
RE naming; some consistency is good. So if the non-range variant doesn't have
'Field' then don't put it on the range variant. But vice-versa is also true --
consistency being most important. I care little wether both should have (or
not have) a "Field" suffix. There seems to be a lot of variation across
Lucene, unfortunately.
bq. I can open a separate issue to "Graduate Range Fields from sandbox" that
will refactor the range field class names and move them to the appropriate
module?
+1
> Add new InetAddressRangeField
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7738
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7738
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Nicholas Knize
> Attachments: LUCENE-7738.patch, LUCENE-7738.patch
>
>
> This issue adda a new {{InetAddressRangeField}} for indexing and querying
> InetAddress ranges.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
