Silly things:

*) should there be LICENCE on the Github repo if you want people to
play/experiment/contribute ideas?
*) This part is future, right? "Custom Java tooling will be used to
process the .adoc file metadata to build up navigation data files" I
can't find it in the repo, but maybe I am confused.

*) Blue sky idea: We should generate Solr index from the Asciidoc file
as well and offer HTML version of the manual bundled with custom Solr
index as a demo collection. Not as part of Solr, but somewhere else
(where).
*) Because "How will we provide search? Recommend probably indexing
generated HTML pages. Could use bin/post from Solr to recurse over the
HTML files and index them. In this case, we will need to figure out
where to host Solr." - this is slightly embarrassing....

Regards,
   Alex.

----
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced


On 13 March 2017 at 16:41, Cassandra Targett <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's been a while, but I (with Hoss' assistance) have been doing some
> work on the proposal I made last summer to move the Ref Guide off of
> Confluence. In my opinion, we're really close to being ready to make
> this move, and I'd like to make it before Solr 7, and maybe even by
> 6.5 (partially, at least; see below).
>
> Here's where I think we are at, and next steps I'd like to take:
>
> 1) We have reorganized the project to reflect how it can look when
> integrated with Lucene/Solr source tree (link below).
>
> The project now has 2 top-level directories, "confluence-export",
> which contains tools for conversion out of Confluence, and
> "solr-ref-guide" for source content, tools and build output of the
> current Ref Guide.
>
> Feedback on this structure is welcome.
>
> 2) We need to decide on our policy for branches. I recall there was
> valid concern about the process around this when I first proposed the
> change. I'd like to iron that out as soon as we can since that will be
> a key part of our new process.
>
> From our discussion last summer, there are 2 potential approaches:
>
> a) Make all changes in 'master' (trunk) and backport to branches for
> releasing the content. We'd need to merge "backward" into upcoming
> release branch.
> b) Make all changes in branch_6x (or branch_7x, etc.) and only move
> things to master when they are only applicable to unreleased next
> major version. We'd merge 6x "forward" when it's time for next major
> version.
>
> There might be other ideas also - we should explore them and come to a
> consensus.
>
> * To move forward on #1 and #2 here, I'll create a JIRA issue for this
> effort (finally), and then create a branch in the lucene-solr repo
> named after the JIRA issue and move the project from the current
> location to the new branch. Then I'll file sub-tasks for the remaining
> work and decisions (such as branching, conversion, publication
> processes, where it lives, etc).
>
> 3) I'd like to see if we can publish the 6.5 Solr Ref Guide PDF with
> this new approach. This would require converting all the content out
> of Confluence, but it would only require that we get the PDF-relevant
> parts of the process finalized in the next couple of weeks.The entire
> publication process would remain the same; however, the editing
> experience for new content would be radically different so that may be
> too substantial an obstacle.
>
> I know it's an ambitious idea, and could leave us in a half-way state
> with the PDF published from one source and online docs in another, but
> it may be worth trying in order to get moving on this front and iron
> out remaining issues before 7.0.
>
> I appreciate in advance your feedback.  As a reminder, you can see the
> demo site/PDF and the project repo at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ctargett/RefGuidePOC/
> https://github.com/ctargett/refguide-asciidoc-poc
>
>
> Thanks,
> Cassandra
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to