[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15930437#comment-15930437
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-10237:
-------------------------------------
You mentioned in an email recently:
bq. This is specially tricky since the users will get results, but will
sometimes be incorrect
So I'm curious how you discovered the problem here and how, without it, results
may be inconsistent.
BTW commit away when you feel it's ready.
> Poly-Fields should work with subfield that have docValues=true
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10237
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10237
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Attachments: SOLR-10237.patch, SOLR-10237.patch, SOLR-10237.patch
>
>
> DocValues aren’t really supported in poly-fields at this point, but they
> don’t complain if the schema definition of the subfield has docValues=true.
> This leaves the index in an inconsistent state, since the SchemaField has
> docValues=true but there are no DV for the field.
> Since this breaks compatibility, I think we should just emit a warning unless
> the subfield is an instance of {{PointField}}. With
> {{\[Int/Long/Float/Double/Date\]PointField}} subfields, this is particularly
> important, since they use {{IndexOrDocValuesQuery}}, that would return
> incorrect results.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
