[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15935341#comment-15935341
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-10304:
-------------------------------------

I'm glad you like it Ishan :-)

I have no convictions about where to put these things... but one option is 
{{SolrDocumentFetcher}}.  Fetching & conversion / decoration could be its 
scope.  If it's _not_ SDF, then perhaps SDF's scope should be more narrow as to 
not include {{decorateDocValueFields}}.  I'm kind of inclined to put all this 
stuff in SDF.

> Refactor Document/Stored-field handling out of SolrIndexSearcher
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10304
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10304
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>         Attachments: SOLR_10304_SolrDocumentFetcher.patch
>
>
> SolrIndexSearcher is nearly 3 thousand lines of code.  A sizable part of it 
> pertains to Document handling, including various stored-field concerns and 
> docValue substitutions (docValueAsStored related).  There are already 
> comments marking the start and end of this part of SolrIndexSearcher, plus 
> there some fields and their initialization that are only in support of those 
> methods.  I propose that all of this go to a new companion class 
> {{SolrDocumentFetcher}}. SolrIndexSearcher can add a getter for it, and where 
> applicable existing callers can call to this instead.  "Override"'s will need 
> to stay of course.
> ( Originally proposed in SOLR-10286 )



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to