[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ben West updated LUCENENET-415:
-------------------------------
Attachment: facet performance.xls
PerformanceTest.cs
I redid the tests, this time with no caching. The faceting is significantly
(10x) slower in big indexes. See "Round 2" in attached spreadsheet.
I tried your idea of doing it with boolean queries, and that seems to be much
faster. If you think that these stats are correct, we might want to consider
doing facets in this style instead of with the bitset.
I tried to look at how Solr does it - I'm not familiar with their code, but it
seems like they do it with a DocSet.
> Contrib/Faceted Search
> ----------------------
>
> Key: LUCENENET-415
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
> Reporter: Digy
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: PerformanceTest.cs, PerformanceTest.cs,
> PerformanceTest.cs, SimpleFacetedSearch.cs, SimpleFacetedSearch.cs,
> SimpleFacetedSearch.cs, TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs,
> TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs, facet performance.xls, facet performance.xls
>
>
> Since I see a lot of questions about faceted search in these days, I plan to
> add a Faceted-Search project to contrib.
> DIGY
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
