Joel, The backcompat indexes are not added for a minor release. They are added on the first bugfix release on the minor branch. There is a note in the TODO: "*Make sure that the backcompat index for the previous release has been added to the release branch. (Note that this will ordinarily not have been done if the current release is X.Y.1, i.e. the first bugfix release off the stable branch.) See the post-release section "Generate Backcompat Indexes" below - remember you'll be generating an index for the previous release.*"
I just pushed the backcompat indices in the release branch. You'll need to generate a new release candidate though. 2017-04-09 3:15 GMT+02:00 Ishan Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]>: > No, this has not changed. I think backcompat indexes for the previous > release was not added. The 6.5.0 's RM might've missed this step. > > On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 4:45 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Looks like I need to add the back compat indexes. In the releaseTodo >> this is post release activity but it looks that has changed. >> >> Joel Bernstein >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >> >> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I don't believe I've missed any steps listed: >>> https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo >>> >>> Joel Bernstein >>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, the keys appear to be sorted out now. Smoke test now gets much >>>> further but fails with the error below. I'll go back see if I've missed a >>>> step... >>>> >>>> Releases that don't seem to be tested: >>>> >>>> 6.5.0 >>>> >>>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>>> >>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1476, in <module> >>>> >>>> main() >>>> >>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1420, in main >>>> >>>> smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir, >>>> c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args)) >>>> >>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1458, in smokeTest >>>> >>>> unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, 'lucene-%s-src.tgz' % >>>> version, gitRevision, version, testArgs, baseURL) >>>> >>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 622, in >>>> unpackAndVerify >>>> >>>> verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision, >>>> version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL) >>>> >>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 768, in >>>> verifyUnpacked >>>> >>>> confirmAllReleasesAreTestedForBackCompat(version, unpackPath) >>>> >>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1396, in >>>> confirmAllReleasesAreTestedForBackCompat >>>> >>>> raise RuntimeError('some releases are not tested by >>>> TestBackwardsCompatibility?') >>>> >>>> RuntimeError: some releases are not tested by >>>> TestBackwardsCompatibility? >>>> >>>> Joel Bernstein >>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> My key has appeared: http://home.apache.org/keys/group/lucene.asc. >>>>> >>>>> I'll work on an RC this evening. >>>>> >>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ok, I've added the PGP fingerprint to my account on id.apache.org. >>>>>> I'll wait until step #1 completes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then I'll populate the three key files mentioned in Ishan's notes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then I'll regenerate the RC. >>>>>> >>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I need to get me public key into my profile on id.apache.org. I'll >>>>>>> work on that first. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Joel, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > On Apr 7, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > a key generated with gpg2 won’t be visible to gpg. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lower-impact fix (maybe) than symlinking - this will make your >>>>>>>> public key visible to ‘gpg’: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $ gpg --recv-key EE64CB1E >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> --------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
