[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15973346#comment-15973346
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10420:
-----------------------------------
Got it. I do think it would be a mistake. In that case, after I've committed
to 5x and 6x, I'll also commit to 6_5 and 5_5.
> Solr 6.x leaking one SolrZkClient instance per second
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10420
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Affects Versions: 5.5.2, 6.4.2, 6.5
> Reporter: Markus Jelsma
> Assignee: Scott Blum
> Fix For: 5.5.5, 5.6, 6.5.1, 6.6, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: OverseerTest.106.stdout, OverseerTest.119.stdout,
> OverseerTest.80.stdout, OverseerTest.DEBUG.43.stdout,
> OverseerTest.DEBUG.48.stdout, OverseerTest.DEBUG.58.stdout,
> SOLR-10420-dragonsinth.patch, SOLR-10420.patch, SOLR-10420.patch,
> SOLR-10420.patch, SOLR-10420.patch, SOLR-10420.patch
>
>
> One of our nodes became berzerk after a restart, Solr went completely nuts!
> So i opened VisualVM to keep an eye on it and spotted a different problem
> that occurs in all our Solr 6.4.2 and 6.5.0 nodes.
> It appears Solr is leaking one SolrZkClient instance per second via
> DistributedQueue$ChildWatcher. That one per second is quite accurate for all
> nodes, there are about the same amount of instances as there are seconds
> since Solr started. I know VisualVM's instance count includes
> objects-to-be-collected, the instance count does not drop after a forced
> garbed collection round.
> It doesn't matter how many cores or collections the nodes carry or how heavy
> traffic is.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
