> On 18 Apr 2017, at 19:15, Walter Underwood <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pretty sure the back-compat did not work, because New Relic cannot find the > MBeans in our 6.5.0 cluster. >
I don’t use New Relic and nobody reported this until now, which is a pity… Could you please be more specific about what MBeans can’t be found? Does this affect all caches or just some of them? > >> On Apr 11, 2017, at 2:28 PM, Walter Underwood <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> We are running 6.5.0 in prod and New Relic is not showing cache stats. I >> think this means it cannot find the MBeans. >> >> I gleaned that from the discussion here: >> >> https://discuss.newrelic.com/t/solr-data-not-appearing-in-apm-solr-tabs-caches-updates/37507/4 >> >> <https://discuss.newrelic.com/t/solr-data-not-appearing-in-apm-solr-tabs-caches-updates/37507/4> >> https://docs.newrelic.com/docs/agents/java-agent/troubleshooting/solr-data-not-appearing-apm-solr-tab-java >> >> <https://docs.newrelic.com/docs/agents/java-agent/troubleshooting/solr-data-not-appearing-apm-solr-tab-java> >> >> wunder >> Walter Underwood >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ <http://observer.wunderwood.org/> (my blog) >> >>> On Mar 3, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Andrzej Białecki >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 2 Mar 2017, at 16:45, Otis Gospodnetić <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> While I love all the new metrics in Solr, I think metrics should be >>>> treated like code/features in terms of how backwards >>>> compatibility/deprecation is handled. Otherwise, on upgrade, people's >>>> monitoring breaks.... and monitoring is kind of important... >>>> Note: Looks like recent Solr metrics changes broke/changed >>>> previously-existing MBeans... >>>> Don't have the details about what was changed and how exactly, but I see >>>> people using Sematext SPM for monitoring Solr are reporting this with Solr >>>> 6.4.1. >>>> >>> >>> Otis, >>> >>> Yes, we’ll be more careful, but we need proper feedback too. My >>> understanding was that SOLR-10035 addressed this by adding back-combat >>> registration under old names. Are you saying there are still some issues in >>> 6.4.1? Can you please be more specific? 6.4.2 is almost out, but if it’s >>> something serious then we should fix it. >>> >>>> >>>> Otis >>>> -- >>>> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection >>>> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/ >>>> <http://sematext.com/> >>>> >>> >> >
