Does not make sense to me. It would do more queries from the client to the cluster, not fewer. And those HTTP request would probably be slower than the intra-cluster requests.
I expect the distributed portion of the query load is small compared to other CPU usage. It adds complexity for no gain in performance. Maybe a slight loss. wunder Walter Underwood [email protected] http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:32 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, Dorian. > I'm not sure about 1. But you can create EmbeddedSolrServer and add > "collection" parameter. It's what's done in > org.apache.solr.response.transform.SubQueryAugmenter [subquery] > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Dorian Hoxha <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi friends, > > Anybody has done this ? Reasons being: 1 less http-request when doing > distributed search. But also not storing data itself (like a > search-only-node). And the other nodes not caring about search-nodes. > > Makes sense ? > > Regards, > Dorian > > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev
