Hi friends,

I searched for this on mailing-list,issues etc, but couldn't find any post.

So, why not have the possibility of <composite_id> ?
Or nobody cared enough to implement it ? Or no gains ?

Cause I've had many cases (on es/solr) that the 'id' was a
"tenant_id:project_id:item_id" and I still had those values as separate
fields, so duplicating. And in many cases values were numbers so also lower
storage compared to one big string.

Am I missing something(s) ?

Regards,
Dorian

Reply via email to