[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16015970#comment-16015970
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-10707:
---------------------------------------
Yeah, just thought about that. _pi and _pd are dynamic fields in techproducts
schema that I'm using:
<dynamicField name="*_pi" type="pint" indexed="true" stored="true"/>
<dynamicField name="*_pd" type="pdouble" indexed="true" stored="true"/>
And when I saw "pint" I had a horrible moment thinking somehow an _ancient_
field type had crept back in ;)
> Dynamic point fields incorrectly being matched
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10707
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10707
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Affects Versions: master (7.0), 6.7
> Reporter: Erick Erickson
>
> Didn't see this on 6x, but didn't look specifically.
> Indexing a doc with just a single field like this:
> doc.addField("id", UUID.randomUUID().toString());
> doc.addField("facet_i", 6850281131226296000L);
> doc.addField("facet_d", 6850281131226296000L);
> where "facet_i" is defined as:
> <field indexed="true" name="facet_i" stored="false" type="tlong"
> docValues="false" />
> and "facet_d" is defined as:
> <field indexed="false" name="facet_d" stored="false" type="tlong"
> docValues="true"/>
> Results in the document being returned as:
> facet_pi: -28447040,
> facet_pd: 6850281131226296000,
> _version_: 1567746273059012600,
> facet_d: 6850281131226296000
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
