[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16020210#comment-16020210
 ] 

Ishan Chattopadhyaya edited comment on LUCENE-7573 at 5/22/17 9:09 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[~jpountz], are we planning to have this for 6.6, or may I downgrade priority 
to a Major instead of Blocker? I'm fine waiting with 6.6 if you think this is 
important. Sorry, I didn't realize this isue was there before cutting the RC1.


was (Author: ichattopadhyaya):
[~jpountz], are we planning to have this for 6.6, or may I downgrade priority 
to a Major instead of Blocker?

> DocValuesConsumer.mergeSortedSetField should use different DV instances for 
> ords and counts
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7573
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7573
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: master (7.0), 6.6
>
>
> Follow-up of LUCENE-7569 where we noticed that SORTED_SET doc values do not 
> use a different underlying DV instance for ords and counts, which can cause 
> bugs if both iterators are consumed at the same time.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to