[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034299#comment-16034299
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7834:
--------------------------------------
I agree with Mike that we should not make lazy loading possible. I don't think
this change improves NRT delays, and if memory is a concern I'd rather increase
the block sizes, which effectively improves the worst-case scenario, than
enable lazy-loading, which only helps if not all fields are used. Also delaying
to search-time a problem that should have occurred at open-time sounds wrong to
me.
> BlockTree's terms index should be loaded into memory lazily
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7834
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7834
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/codecs
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Attachments: LUCENE_7834_BlockTreeLazyFST.patch
>
>
> I propose that BlockTree delay loading the FST prefix terms index into memory
> until {{terms(String)}} is first called. This seems like how it should work
> since if someone wants to eager load then they can use {{IndexReaderWarmer}}.
> By making the FST lazy load, we can be more NRT friendly (if some fields are
> rarely used), and also save memory (if some fields are rarely used).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
