[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16039986#comment-16039986
]
Michael Sun commented on SOLR-10317:
------------------------------------
bq. any thoughts, please?
Well, this is a good topic. Framework is fun and always a tradeoff. :) On one
side, we should not over invest on framework because the tests and numbers
produced by tests are things really matter. That's the target we should focus
on. On the other hand, if framework is under invested, in long run there is
high cost. One way to understand the cost is to look how many Solr performance
frameworks there are already, not to mention a few not published (but I
personally know).
I am one of guys who built my own (going to be open source soon, adding one
more into the collection). One of the motivation for me to build one is 'only
need to extend framework but not rebuild one for all Solr performance work in
near future'. In my option this is important and should be part of the goals of
this project. And be part of the discussion about framework choice too (no
matter which one is chosen).
> Solr Nightly Benchmarks
> -----------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10317
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10317
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Labels: gsoc2017, mentor
> Attachments: changes-lucene-20160907.json,
> changes-solr-20160907.json, managed-schema,
> Narang-Vivek-SOLR-10317-Solr-Nightly-Benchmarks.docx,
> Narang-Vivek-SOLR-10317-Solr-Nightly-Benchmarks-FINAL-PROPOSAL.pdf,
> solrconfig.xml
>
>
> Solr needs nightly benchmarks reporting. Similar Lucene benchmarks can be
> found here, https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/.
> Preferably, we need:
> # A suite of benchmarks that build Solr from a commit point, start Solr
> nodes, both in SolrCloud and standalone mode, and record timing information
> of various operations like indexing, querying, faceting, grouping,
> replication etc.
> # It should be possible to run them either as an independent suite or as a
> Jenkins job, and we should be able to report timings as graphs (Jenkins has
> some charting plugins).
> # The code should eventually be integrated in the Solr codebase, so that it
> never goes out of date.
> There is some prior work / discussion:
> # https://github.com/shalinmangar/solr-perf-tools (Shalin)
> # https://github.com/chatman/solr-upgrade-tests/blob/master/BENCHMARKS.md
> (Ishan/Vivek)
> # SOLR-2646 & SOLR-9863 (Mark Miller)
> # https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/ (Mike McCandless)
> # https://github.com/lucidworks/solr-scale-tk (Tim Potter)
> There is support for building, starting, indexing/querying and stopping Solr
> in some of these frameworks above. However, the benchmarks run are very
> limited. Any of these can be a starting point, or a new framework can as well
> be used. The motivation is to be able to cover every functionality of Solr
> with a corresponding benchmark that is run every night.
> Proposing this as a GSoC 2017 project. I'm willing to mentor, and I'm sure
> [~shalinmangar] and [[email protected]] would help here.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
