[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16042986#comment-16042986
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10844:
---------------------------------
bq. I think it's a duplicate of SOLR-9989?
I don't see how?
SOLR-9989 is specifically about the (JSON) "FacetModule" and adding support for
"faceting on points fields" (ie: as the facet field) -- that has nothing to do
with Grouping.
In this issue, i'm pointing out that the test involving the "group.facet" param
(in SimpleFacets) fails when the tests schemas use points fields instead of int
fields -- if you apply the patch and look at the logs the actual failures
involve using a group.facet param pointed at a *String* field -- when the
group.field is pointed at a numeric field.
> group.facet failures when the grouping field is Points based
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10844
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10844
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Attachments: SOLR-10844.patch
>
>
> As discovered when working on SOLR-10807: if you change all existing test
> configs to use FooPointField instead of TrieFooField, you get odd failures
> when {{group.facet}} is used in conjunction with grouping on a point field
> (even if the group.facet field is a string field)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
