On 5/31/11 2:01 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
I checked sums and sigs, ran tests and briefly scanned CHANGES, README etc.

One thing I found is that the 'src' package includes an "index.html" and
a "docs" folder. If you load index.html in the browser, almost all the
links work, except for the Javadocs, because they are not part of the
'src' package (which is ok). But then if you "ant javadocs", they are
created under "build/docs" and not "docs". so links still don't work.

I don't think it's a showstopper b/c the docs work fine in the binary
release, though it'd be good if we can fix that somehow for future
releases. I don't like inconsistencies. Maybe we should remove all
"docs" and generate them by an Ant target?

Anyway, given that, here is my +1 for RC2.

I won't have time to test this RC2, but I'm +1 on principle - it passes tests, contains many improvements, and is awaited eagerly by the community :)

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
 ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to