[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16049342#comment-16049342
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on SOLR-7878:
--------------------------------

I'm not to familar with the code in question but...

# IIUC you're suggesting a (cached) wrapper around SortedNumericDocValues that 
would require converting at least a couple 
numeric->(legacy-numeric)byte->numeric conversions to be used as a drop in 
substitute for SorterSetDocValues ... is that really something that would be 
eaiser/better then creating a new {{FacetFieldProcessorByArray}} subclass 
specifically for dealing with the SortedNumericDocValues ?
# shouldn't this discussion be in SOLR-9989 ... frankly i'm not clear on why 
SOLR-7878 is still open since PointFields already use NumericDocValues, it 
seems unlikely we'll want to keep TrieFields around long enough to bother with 
trying to make it possible/optional to use NumericDocValues with TrieFields.

> Use SortedNumericDocValues (efficient sort & facet on multi-valued numeric 
> fields)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-7878
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7878
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Facet Module
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>
> Lucene has a SortedNumericDocValues (i.e. multi-valued numeric DocValues), 
> ever since late in the 4x versions.  Solr's TrieField.createFields 
> unfortunately still uses SortedSetDocValues for the multi-valued case.  
> SortedNumericDocValues is more efficient than SortedSetDocValues; for example 
> there is no 'ordinal' mapping for sorting/faceting needed.  
> Unfortunately, updating Solr here would be quite a bit of work, since there 
> are backwards-compatibility concerns, and faceting code would need a new code 
> path implementation just for this.  Sorting is relatively simple thanks to 
> SortedNumericSortField, and today multi-valued sorting isn't directly 
> possible.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to