[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16049377#comment-16049377 ]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10177: --------------------------------- I actually think we can eliminate the randomized {{<field ... type="$variable" ... />}} usage completely and focus solely on randomzing the {{<fieldType ... class="$variable" ... />}} approach (which would also simplify/reduce the number of fieldTypes we need to add to all schemas) ... see SOLR-10864 for details. Assuming SOLR-10864 / SOLR-10807 moves forward, i'll fold SOLR-10177 into those and remove the existing "type name" randomization. > Consolidate randomized usage of PointFields in schemas > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-10177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Test > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > schema-inplace-updates.xml use per fieldType point fields randomization, > whereas other some schemas use per-field. However, the variable name is > similar and should be revisited and standardized across our tests. > Discussions here > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?focusedCommentId=15875108&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15875108. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org