[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

James Dyer updated SOLR-2571:
-----------------------------

    Attachment: SOLR-2571.patch

I'm betting the jury will rule we keep this a <float /> element, so here's a 
patch that changes DirectSolrSpellChecker.  I also added a unit test for 
thresholdTokenFrequency and added a (commented-out) line for it in the example 
solrconfig.xml.

There are 3 TODO's in the unit test code:
1. My ignorance of the expression language used in unit-tests lead mem write an 
old-style long-form unit test.  If someone can show me how to convert this to a 
1-liner I would be very appreciative.

2. I found that DirectSolrSpellChecker returns results in a slightly different 
format than IndexBasedSpellChecker.  Is this OK?  Can SOLRJ handle this or do 
we need to tweak there?

3. Also, in one case IndexBasedSpellChecker returns "correctlySpelled=false" 
while DirectSolrSpellChecker returns "correctlySpelled=true".  Is this 
discrepancy valid?

> IndexBasedSpellChecker "thresholdTokenFrequency" fails with a 
> ClassCastException on startup
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2571
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2571
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: spellchecker
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.1, 3.1, 4.0
>            Reporter: James Dyer
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: whereIsHossManWhenYouNeedHim
>             Fix For: 3.3, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-2571.patch, SOLR-2571.patch, SOLR-2571.solr3.2.patch
>
>
> When parsing the configuration for thresholdTokenFrequency", the 
> IndexBasedSpellChecker tries to pull a Float from the DataConfig.xml-derrived 
> NamedList.  However, this comes through as a String.  Therefore, a 
> ClassCastException is always thrown whenever this parameter is specified.  
> The code ought to be doing "Float.parseFloat(...)" on the value.
> This looks like a nice feature to use in cases the data contains misspelled 
> or rare words leading to spurious "correct" queries.  I would have liked to 
> have used this with a project we just completed however this bug prevented 
> that.  This issue came up recently in the User's mailing list so I am raising 
> an issue now.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to