[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Hoss Man updated SOLR-10835:
----------------------------
    Priority: Blocker  (was: Major)

setting as blocker since the test failures now leave this "fix" in an amorphous 
state for the purposes of tracking against 7.0

[~tomasflobbe]: can you please dig in and figure out if these test failures 
represent a failure in the code added as part of this issue that should also be 
resolved as part of this issue, or a test bug introduced by this issue that can 
be fixedup easily, or a distinct previously unknown bug that was surfaced by 
your increased test coverage that should be tracked/prioritized in it's own new 
jira?

> ExportWriter only works with TrieFooFields, not FooPointFields
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10835
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10835
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 7.0, 6.7
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-10835.patch, SOLR-10835.patch, SOLR-10835.patch
>
>
> ExportWriter explicitly fails hard if you attempt to use it with any of the 
> new Numeric Points based fields.
> The current failures come from explicit {{if (fieldType instanceof 
> TrieFooField)}} checks in {{ExportWriter.getFieldWriters}} -- those could 
> probably be replaced with {{instanceof FooValueFieldType}} (the numeric 
> marker interfaces) or {{getNumericType()}} but i suspect in the multivalued 
> case other problems will arise due to how ExportWriter dips into the guts of 
> DocValues and assumes SortedSetDocValues 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to