[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Steve Rowe updated SOLR-11023:
------------------------------
    Attachment: SOLR-11023.patch

More complete WIP patch, almost done.

The tests are mostly fleshed out; there is one remaining nocommit, to add a 
test of set queries over.

Also, the docs need fixing up to mention the new type and the fact that the old 
type is deprecated.

I created SOLR-11193 for problems with multi-valued EnumField; I don't plan on 
blocking 7.0 for fixes there.  I've put assumes in EnumFieldTest to avoid 
testing the problematic functionality with EnumField.

> Need SortedNumerics/Points version of EnumField
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11023
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11023
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Steve Rowe
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: numeric-tries-to-points
>             Fix For: 7.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-11023.patch, SOLR-11023.patch, SOLR-11023.patch, 
> SOLR-11023.patch
>
>
> although it's not a subclass of TrieField, EnumField does use 
> "LegacyIntField" to index the int value associated with each of the enum 
> values, in addition to using SortedSetDocValuesField when {{docValues="true" 
> multivalued="true"}}.
> I have no idea if Points would be better/worse then Terms for low cardinality 
> usecases like EnumField, but either way we should think about a new variant 
> of EnumField that doesn't depend on 
> LegacyIntField/LegacyNumericUtils.intToPrefixCoded and uses 
> SortedNumericDocValues.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to