Releasing 6.7 means we cannot start the 7.0 release process until 6.7 is
out. Do we really want to delay 7.0 even more? I won't object to releasing
6.7 but if we want to do it let's get a vote started today.

Le mer. 9 août 2017 à 22:31, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> a écrit :

> +1
>
>
> Den 9. aug. 2017 kl. 20.18 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>:
>
> +1
> I think a 6.7 release would be very good.
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:46 PM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Release early, release often!
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Solr and Lucene have had fixes backported to 6x (not 6.6) since the
>>> 7.0 label was set, most in Solr. Some of the fixes are useful "in the
>>> field", I've back-ported some of them myself.
>>>
>>> What objections are there to a 6.7 release? We'd always prefer to
>>> release nothing except important bug fixes on a prior branch, but the
>>> release process for 7.0 has taken some time and changes have
>>> accumulated.
>>>
>>> This might be the last, best time to wrap up 6x with a 6.7 as much as
>>> we can before officially releasing 7.0.
>>>
>>> What do people think?
>>>
>>> Erick
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
>

Reply via email to