[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ignacio Vera updated LUCENE-7934:
---------------------------------
    Attachment: LUCENE-7934.patch

Attached the proposed change.

> PlanetObject Interface
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7934
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7934
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/spatial3d
>            Reporter: Ignacio Vera
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7934.patch
>
>
> Hi [~daddywri],
> I propose to add a new interface call PlanetObject which all shapes should 
> implement. It is actually extracted from class BasePlanetObject. The 
> motivation is that currently the method getPlanetModel() is not visible and 
> therefore there is no possibility to know to which PlanetModel a shape 
> belongs to. 
> The side effect for this change is that the constructors for composite shapes 
> change as they need to be created with a PlanetModel. I think this is correct 
> as then we can check the planet model when adding a shape and make sure all 
> objects in a composite belongs to the same Planet model.
> In addition, we check that two shape belongs to the shape Planet model when 
> calling getRelationship(GeoShape geoShape).  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to