Hi,
I just noticed, that our Hadoop friends released Hadoop 2.7.4. This fixes the stupid Java 9 bug in their static initializer (StringIndexOutOfBounds). So I’d like to also get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11261 in. If Jenkins is happy on 7.x and master, this should be easy. If you think it’s too risky (Hadoop 2.7.2 -> 2.7.4), we can live with the workaround in Lucene 6.6.1! But the workaround is really hacky: It changes the “java.version” system property temporarily on Java 9 while initializing Hadoop, which is not something you should ever do! Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 12:53 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Release a 6.6.1 Hi, I need to backport SOLR-10966 to branch 6.6, otherwise Jenkins does not pass with Java 9. Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 12:00 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Release a 6.6.1 Hi, I enabled Jenkins jobs on 👮. ASF was active already. Uwe Am 18. August 2017 23:34:23 MESZ schrieb Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in <mailto:va...@vthacker.in> >: >From the bug fixes in lucene 7.0 do we need to backport any of these issues : >LUCENE-7859 / LUCENE-7871 / LUCENE-7914 ? I plan on backporting these three Solr fixes on Sunday SOLR-10698 SOLR-10719 SOLR-11228 looking through the 7.0 bug fixes these two look important to get in as well : SOLR-10983 SOLR-9262 So if no one get's to it I'll try backporting them as well Can someone please enable Jenkins on the branch again? On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com <mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: Right, that was the original note before we decided to backport a bunch of other stuff and I decided it made no sense to omit this one. All that has to happen is remove the " (note, not in 7.0, is in 7.1)" bits since it's in 6.6, 6.x, 7.0, 7.1 and master. Good catch! On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in <mailto:va...@vthacker.in> > wrote: > Should I then go remove the note part from the CHANGES entry in branch_6_6 ? > > * SOLR-11177: CoreContainer.load needs to send lazily loaded core > descriptors to the proper list rather than send > them all to the transient lists. (Erick Erickson) (note, not in 7.0, is in > 7.1) > > I see a commit for this in branch_7_0 > > Commit c73b5429b722b09b9353ec82627a35e2b864b823 in lucene-solr's branch > refs/heads/branch_7_0 from Erick > [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=c73b542 ] > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com > <mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com> > > wrote: >> >> Well, it is in 7.0. Everything I moved to 6.6.1 is also in 7.0, or should >> be. >> >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in >> <mailto:va...@vthacker.in> > wrote: >> > Hi Erick, >> > >> > I was going through the CHANGES file from the 6_6 branch and just >> > curious >> > why are we not planning on putting SOLR-11177 in 7.0 ? >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Erick Erickson >> > <erickerick...@gmail.com <mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> OK, I'm done with my changes for 7.0, I think Varun might have a few >> >> too. >> >> >> >> And things didn't melt down overnight so... >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net >> >> <mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net> > >> >> wrote: >> >> > +1 on getting the fixes into 7.0 if you are confident with those, and >> >> > if >> >> > they are a part of 6.6.1. >> >> > >> >> > Thanks for taking care of this Erick. >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:24 PM Erick Erickson >> >> > <erickerick...@gmail.com <mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com> > >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> FYI: >> >> >> >> >> >> I'll be backporting the following to SOLR 7.0 today: >> >> >> >> >> >> SOLR-11024: ParallelStream should set the StreamContext when >> >> >> constructing SolrStreams: >> >> >> SOLR-11177: CoreContainer.load needs to send lazily loaded core >> >> >> descriptors to the proper list rather than send them all to the >> >> >> transient lists. >> >> >> SOLR-11122: Creating a core should write a core.properties file >> >> >> first >> >> >> and clean up on failure >> >> >> >> >> >> and those as well as several others to 6.6.1. >> >> >> >> >> >> Since some of these depend on others, I need to add them in a >> >> >> specific >> >> >> order. I intend to run minimal tests for each JIRA before pushing, >> >> >> then when they are all in place go through the full test cycle, >> >> >> precommit and all that. I doubt that other than the flurry of commit >> >> >> messages anyone will notice, at least if this stuff is as safe to >> >> >> backport as I believe people _better_ not. >> >> >> >> >> >> If these cause any serious problems for the 7.0 code line, feel free >> >> >> to back them out any time after today. >> >> >> >> >> >> Why am I bothering the 7.0 code line? well, it's awkward to have a >> >> >> fix >> >> >> in 6.6.1, skip 7.0 and have it show up again in 7.1. We can live >> >> >> with >> >> >> some thing not being in 7.0 if any of this causes disruptions >> >> >> though. >> >> >> >> >> >> Erick >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Erik Hatcher >> >> >> <erik.hatc...@gmail.com <mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Yes, I’m confident in that patch and its safety, thanks Varun! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Erik >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Aug 16, 2017, at 2:22 PM, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in >> >> >> > <mailto:va...@vthacker.in> > >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > @Erik -If you are confident with the patch and if you think it's >> >> >> > safe >> >> >> > then >> >> >> > please go ahead and commit it. I'll try having a look at it >> >> >> > tomorrow >> >> >> > as >> >> >> > well. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I will start back-porting issues which I am comfortable with. If >> >> >> > others >> >> >> > can >> >> >> > chime in as well it will be great. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I'll aim to cut an RC on Monday 21st August evening PST time so >> >> >> > everyone >> >> >> > get's time to get the fixes in. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Any objections in the approach? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Erik Hatcher >> >> >> > <erik.hatc...@gmail.com <mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I’d like to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10874 >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> soon >> >> >> >> as well. Varun, if you’d like to take this one over that’d be >> >> >> >> fine >> >> >> >> by >> >> >> >> me >> >> >> >> too ;) otherwise prod me back channel and I’ll get to it. >> >> >> >> Ideally I >> >> >> >> should >> >> >> >> have applied this one ages ago for 7.0, so maybe it can make it >> >> >> >> in >> >> >> >> time >> >> >> >> for >> >> >> >> 6.6.1 and 7.0. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Erik >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 14, 2017, at 5:51 PM, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in >> >> >> >> <mailto:va...@vthacker.in> > >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From the change log of 6.7 / 7.0 and 7.1 the total count of bug >> >> >> >> fixes >> >> >> >> under lucene and solr are >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Lucene : 7 >> >> >> >> Solr : 61 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'd be happy to volunteer as a release manager for a bug fix >> >> >> >> 6.6.1 >> >> >> >> release >> >> >> >> if others in the community think it's a good idea >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> >> >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de
