[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16138678#comment-16138678
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7939:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit 3be5808caf0235081aa47b3604e00d3b5f358d80 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~jpountz]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=3be5808 ]

LUCENE-7939: Speed up MinShouldMatchSumScorer in conjunctions.


> Speed up MinShouldMatchSumScorer in conjunctions
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7939
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7939
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: master (8.0), 7.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7939.patch, LUCENE-7939.patch
>
>
> MinShouldMatchSumScorer has good iteration capabilities, but if it is not 
> used as a lead for the iteration then the advance() call might make a lot of 
> efforts in order to find the next match while we should instead let the lead 
> iterator of the conjunction skip over non-matching documents. In this issue 
> I'd like to explore changing MinShouldMatchSumScorer by giving it a two-phase 
> iterator and making advance() return a candidate for the next match that is 
> less good but much cheaper to compute.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to