[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16141857#comment-16141857
]
Karl Wright commented on LUCENE-7941:
-------------------------------------
[~ivera], I think what you are trying to say is that this method in
GeoDegenerateShape:
{code}
@Override
public boolean intersects(GeoShape geoShape) {
return false;
}
{code}
... cannot be properly computed because we have no general way to do it, other
than implement something special for all GeoAreaShapes when they intersect with
points. I see what you are trying to do to work around this issue.
I wonder what would happen if we extend the contract for this method to allow a
"true" return for *either* an intersection with an edge, but *also* for
anything wholly within the shape, if the former is too hard to compute? Then
you could use geoShape.isWithin(). Would that yield sensible values for
getRelationship()?
> GeoDegeneratePoints return intersects when located in edge shape
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7941
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7941
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ignacio Vera
> Assignee: Karl Wright
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-7941-test.patch
>
>
> If the degenerate Geopoint lays on the boundary of a shape, the
> relationships between the objects are not symetrical:
> The bounding box "thinks" it contains the degenerated point.
> The degenerated point "thinks" it intersects the shape.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
