[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16145268#comment-16145268
 ] 

Ignacio Vera commented on LUCENE-7936:
--------------------------------------

I have actually changed my mind. The first option is so much cleaner to 
implement and it is totally generic and the extra byte does not generate 
noticable difference in performance (as expected). 

I do not like so much the complexity added by option 2. 

What do you think?



> Extend Geoshape interfaces so objects can be copied/serialized
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7936
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7936
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/spatial3d
>            Reporter: Ignacio Vera
>            Assignee: Karl Wright
>             Fix For: 6.7, master (8.0), 7.1
>
>         Attachments: factory.patch, GeoBinaryCodec.patch, 
> LUCENE-7936-GeoComplexPolygon.patch, LUCENE-7936.patch, LUCENE-7936.patch, 
> LUCENE-7936.patch, LUCENE-7936-test.patch, Spatial4j.patch
>
>
> Hi [[email protected]],
> I would like to propose to extends the GeoShape interfaces to be able to 
> copy/serialized the objects. The current status and  propose change is as 
> following:
> GeoPoint: It can be serialized by using x, y, z
> GeoCircle:  It can be serialized by using getCenter() and getRadius() and 
> getPlanetModel()
> GeoCompositeShape: It can be serialized by accesing shapes using size() and 
> GetShape(int index)
> GeoPath: add methods to the interface getPoints() and getCutoffAngle()
> GeoPolygon: This is the most complicated one as we have different types:
>    1.- GeoCompositePolygon is just a composite
>    2.- GeoConcavePolygon and GeoConvexPolygon: Create a new interface for 
> those polygons which exposes the points, holes, internaledges and 
> concavity/convexity
>    3.- GeoComplexPolygons: Do nothing, they are too complex to be serialize??
> I am intersested in accesing the discreatization of the polygons into convex 
> and concave ones for other reasons as well. I think this should be expose as 
> they end result can be used for other use cases.
> Cheers,
> I.
>   



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to