[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16161704#comment-16161704
]
Alexandre Rafalovitch commented on LUCENE-7964:
-----------------------------------------------
For solr-start.com, I did Javadoc parsing for the comments as well as for
method signature checking,as not all Lucene components could be used in Solr
definitions. But yes, I do wish the components were self-documented, it would
enable a lot of different use-cases and pending Jiras.
I did suggest about a year ago on the mailing list to use MBeans (or - worse
but similar - JavaBeans), but it got -1 (-2 even):
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/94f411be62aba30746e28861569fd6cf5dc1453e1d6c17b89e4d4a68@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
(towards the end)
Any other self-documenting method would work too, but my feeling was just that
if we use something that is already codified, we may also benefit from
pre-existing tools.
> Remove Solr fieldType XML example from Lucene AnalysisFactories JavaDoc
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7964
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7964
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: general/javadocs
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 7.1
>
>
> As proposed and discussed in this dev-list thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9add7e4a3ad28b307dc51532a609b423982922d734064f26f8104744@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
> [~rcmuir] [~dsmiley] [~thetaphi]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
