[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16198964#comment-16198964
 ] 

Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-7887:
------------------------------------

While looking into SOLR-11453, I attempted to get help from the log4j mailing 
list on creating a configuration to low slow queries to a separate file.

Their response was basically "log4j1 is end of life, upgrade and we might be 
able to help."  This isn't really very helpful, but it's also a completely 
understandable position, so I'm looking at this issue again.

I see that we have a WIP patch for implementing a new logwatcher, but I haven't 
looked at it closely yet.  If anyone who's looked at this upgrade has any 
helpful advice, please let me know.


> Upgrade Solr to use log4j2 -- log4j 1 now officially end of life
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-7887
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7887
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 5.2.1
>            Reporter: Shawn Heisey
>         Attachments: SOLR-7887-WIP.patch
>
>
> The logging services project has officially announced the EOL of log4j 1:
> https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/apache_logging_services_project_announces
> In the official binary jetty deployment, we use use log4j 1.2 as our final 
> logging destination, so the admin UI has a log watcher that actually uses 
> log4j and java.util.logging classes.  That will need to be extended to add 
> log4j2.  I think that might be the largest pain point to this upgrade.
> There is some crossover between log4j2 and slf4j.  Figuring out exactly which 
> jars need to be in the lib/ext directory will take some research.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to