[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16210460#comment-16210460
]
Alexandre Rafalovitch commented on SOLR-11490:
----------------------------------------------
Here's what I am getting for Tokenizer factories. Not committing them yet, as
they may have similar issues as mentioned before for Filter factories.
[~rcmuir], any of these look wrong to you, so we could figure out where the
problem exactly is?
{panel}
ClassicTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 3.1
EdgeNGramTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 1.2.0
HMMChineseTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 4.8.0
ICUTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 3.1
JapaneseTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 3.6.0
KeywordTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 1.1.0
LetterTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 1.1.0
LowerCaseTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 1.1.0
NGramTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 1.2.0
PathHierarchyTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 3.1
PatternTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in solr1.2
SimplePatternSplitTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 6.5.0
SimplePatternTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 6.5.0
StandardTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 1.1.0
ThaiTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 4.8.0
TokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 1.1.0
UAX29URLEmailTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 3.1
UIMAAnnotationsTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 4.0.0
UIMATypeAwareAnnotationsTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 4.0.0
WhitespaceTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 1.1.0
WikipediaTokenizerFactory.java first shows up in 3.1
{panel}
Note, PatternTokenizerFactory already has a @since tag, which is why it looks
different from those proposed automatically.
> Add @since javadoc tags to the interesting Solr/Lucene classes
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11490
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11490
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Alexandre Rafalovitch
> Assignee: Alexandre Rafalovitch
> Priority: Minor
>
> As per the discussion on the dev list, it may be useful to add Javadoc since
> tags to significant (or even all) Java files.
> For user-facing files (such as analyzers, URPs, stream evaluators, etc) it
> would be useful when trying to identifying whether a particular class only
> comes later than user's particular version.
> For other classes, it may be useful for historical reasons.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
