[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049020#comment-13049020
 ] 

jess canabou commented on SOLR-2218:
------------------------------------

Hi all

I'm a bit confused by this thread, but think I have the same or almost same 
issue. I'm searching on a document with over 7000000 entries. I'm using the 
start and rows parameters (querying 30000 recs at a time), and notice the query 
times getting increasingly large, the further into the document I get. Unlike 
Bill, I do not care about scores or relevancy, and am having difficulty 
understanding whether the docid is a suitable solution to my problem. Is there 
something I can simply tack onto the end of my query to help speed up these 
query times? From what I understand, it's not necessary for me to be sorting 
all the rows before the chunk of data I'm querying on
My query looks as below.
http://hostname/solr/select/?q=blablabla&version=2.2&start=4000000rows=30000&indent=on&fl=<bunch
 of fields>

Any help would be greatly appreciated :)

> Performance of start= and rows= parameters are exponentially slow with large 
> data sets
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2218
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2218
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Build
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.1
>            Reporter: Bill Bell
>
> With large data sets, > 10M rows.
> Setting start=<large number> and rows=<large numbers> is slow, and gets 
> slower the farther you get from start=0 with a complex query. Random also 
> makes this slower.
> Would like to somehow make this performance faster for looping through large 
> data sets. It would be nice if we could pass a pointer to the result set to 
> loop, or support very large rows=<number>.
> Something like:
> rows=1000
> start=0
> spointer=string_my_query_1
> Then within interval (like 5 mins) I can reference this loop:
> Something like:
> rows=1000
> start=1000
> spointer=string_my_query_1
> What do you think? Since the data is too great the cache is not helping.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to