[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16218076#comment-16218076
]
Cao Manh Dat edited comment on SOLR-11532 at 10/25/17 4:35 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Here is my patch for this ticket. Aiming to handle not decodable fields
carefully.
- {{RetrieveFieldsOptimizer}} will only use DV for fields that are decodable.
- {{SolrDocumentFetcher}} will handle decoding DV more carefully. If there are
an Exception in decode a DV, it will fall-back on using stored value instead.
[~dsmiley] [~steve_rowe] What do your guys think?
was (Author: caomanhdat):
Here is my patch for this ticket. Aiming to handle not decodable fields
carefully.
- {{RetrieveFieldsOptimizer}} will only use DV for fields that are decodable.
- {{SolrDocumentFetcher}} will handle decoding DV more carefully. If there are
an Exception in decode a DV, it will fall-back on using stored value instead.
> Solr hits NPE when fl only contains DV fields and any of them is a spatial
> field
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11532
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11532
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: spatial
> Affects Versions: 7.1
> Reporter: Cao Manh Dat
> Assignee: Cao Manh Dat
> Attachments: SOLR-11532-test.patch, SOLR-11532.patch
>
>
> Right now, Solr does not know how to decode DV value of
> LatLonPointSpatialField. Therefore, Solr will hit NPE when trying to do that,
> for example:
> - when fl contains a spatial field and it is DV + not stored
> - when fl only contains DV fields and any of them is a spatial field ( stored
> + DV ). Because SOLR-8344 will always use values from DV fields. This seems a
> common case.
> Stacktrace (from Solr 7.1)
> {code}
> 2017-10-23 10:28:52,528 [qtp1649011739-67] ERROR HttpSolrCall -
> null:java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.SolrDocumentFetcher.decorateDocValueFields(SolrDocumentFetcher.java:525)
> at org.apache.solr.response.DocsStreamer.next(DocsStreamer.java:108)
> at org.apache.solr.response.DocsStreamer.next(DocsStreamer.java:57)
> at
> org.apache.solr.response.BinaryResponseWriter$Resolver.writeResultsBody(BinaryResponseWriter.java:126)
> at
> org.apache.solr.response.BinaryResponseWriter$Resolver.writeResults(BinaryResponseWriter.java:145)
> at
> org.apache.solr.response.BinaryResponseWriter$Resolver.resolve(BinaryResponseWriter.java:89)
> at
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeVal(JavaBinCodec.java:239)
> at
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeNamedList(JavaBinCodec.java:223)
> at
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeKnownType(JavaBinCodec.java:330)
> at
> org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.writeVal(JavaBinCodec.java:228)
> at org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.marshal(JavaBinCodec.java:155)
> {code}
> This bug found by [~kiranch]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
