[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16251192#comment-16251192
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-11458:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 7c54b2b116d6ee0012c598373fed1b93af74caf6 in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/master from [~ab]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=7c54b2b ]
SOLR-11458: Improve this test to show the failure to be fixed in SOLR-11458.
> Bugs in MoveReplicaCmd handling of failures
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11458
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11458
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Affects Versions: 7.0, 7.0.1, 7.1, master (8.0)
> Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki
> Assignee: Andrzej Bialecki
>
> Spin-off from SOLR-11449:
> {quote}
> There's a section of code in moveNormalReplica that ensures that we don't
> lose a shard leader during move. There's no corresponding protection in
> moveHdfsReplica, which means that moving a replica that is also a shard
> leader may potentially lead to data loss (eg. when replicationFactor=1).
> Also, there's no rollback strategy when moveHdfsReplica partially fails,
> unlike in moveNormalReplica where the code simply skips deleting the original
> replica - it seems that the code should attempt to restore the original
> replica in this case? When RF=1 and such failure occurs then not restoring
> the original replica means lost shard.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
