[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16269554#comment-16269554
 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11695:
-------------------------------------

We already use "count" for the number of documents in a bucket, so for the 
non-unique number of values, how about something like nvals or nvalues or 
numvals?
For a terms facet, there is missing:true which creates a missing bucket that 
has all sub-facets as well as the count.  But you're right that we should have 
a missing function as well (one could do it themselves as a query sub0facet of 
"-field:[* TO *]", but we should make it easier and more functional).


> JSON FacetModule needs equivilents for StatsComponent's "count" and "missing" 
> features
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11695
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11695
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>
> StatsComponent supports stats named "count" and "missing":
> * count: for the set of documents we're computing stats over, "how many 
> _non-distinct_ values exist in those documents in the specified field?" (or 
> in the case of an arbitrary function: "in how many of these documents does 
> true==ValueSource.exist()" ?)
> ** no to be confused with the number of _unique_ values (aprox "cardinality" 
> or exact "countDistinct")
> * missing: for the set of documents we're computing stats over, "how many of 
> those documents do not have any value in the specified field?" (or in the 
> case of an arbitrary function: "in how many of thse documents does 
> false==ValueSource.exist()" ?)
> (NOTE: for a single valued field, these are essentially inveses of each 
> other, but for multivalued fields "count" actaully returns the total number 
> of "value instances" not just the number of docs that have at least one value)
> AFAICT there is no equivalent functionality supported by the JSON 
> FacetModule, which will be a blocker preventing some users from migrating 
> from using stats.field (or facet.pivot+stats.field) to json.facet.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to