[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16277325#comment-16277325
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-8015:
-------------------------------------
thanks for the analysis! I still don't even really want to commit the "floor"
modifications for In and Ine because i dont like it: really a scoring formula
should be able to return a tiny tiny value for a stopword, that should be ok.
It shouldnt have to be a number between 1 and 43 or whatever to work with
lucene.
For model IF its justifiable, just like its justifiable in the BM25 case,
because the formula is fundamentally broken you know, i mean we dont want
negative scores for stopwords.
But your analysis suggests maybe we can look at a more surgical fix, like a
nextUp/nextDown somewhere?
> TestBasicModelIne.testRandomScoring failure
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8015
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8015
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Attachments: LUCENE-8015_test_fangs.patch
>
>
> reproduce with: ant test -Dtestcase=TestBasicModelIne
> -Dtests.method=testRandomScoring -Dtests.seed=86E85958B1183E93
> -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=vi-VN -Dtests.timezone=Pacific/Tongatapu
> -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF8
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
