David, Did you mean SOLR-11662 rather than SOLR-11698? SOLR-11698 looks like a big change that isn't nearly ready yet.
Le ven. 1 déc. 2017 à 16:59, David Smiley <[email protected]> a écrit : > Doug's issue SOLR-11698 needs my final code review (probably final any > way) and I plan to commit that as late as Monday if it goes well. > > Erick... IMO: > * LUCENE-8048 probably needs some "bake" time IMO, plus it's not clear if > it's committable yet (waiting for other input). > * SOLR-11687 definitely include > > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:41 AM Erick Erickson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> SOLR-11687 and LUCENE-8048 are ones I'd like to consider getting in to >> 7.2, should they have longer to bake though? Any opinions? >> >> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > +1. I have a couple of tickets that I should have wrapped up by Monday. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> -- > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >
