Fine with me.

Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 22:34, Varun Thacker <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Hi Adrien,
>
> I'd like to commit SOLR-11590 . The issue had a patch couple of weeks ago
> and has been reviewed but never got committed. I've run all the tests twice
> as well to verify.
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Andrzej Białecki <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 18:05, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Andrzej, ok to merge since it is a bug fix. Since we're close to the RC
>> build, maybe try to get someone familiar with the code to review it to make
>> sure it doesn't have unexpected side-effects?
>>
>>
>> Sure I’ll do this - thanks!
>>
>>
>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 17:57, Andrzej Białecki <
>> [email protected]> a écrit :
>>
>>> Adrien,
>>>
>>> If it’s ok I would also like to merge SOLR-11458, this significantly
>>> reduces the chance of accidental data loss when using MoveReplicaCmd.
>>>
>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 14:44, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Quick update:
>>>
>>> LUCENE-8043, SOLR-9137, SOLR-11662 and SOLR-11687 have been merged, they
>>> will be in 7.2.
>>>
>>> LUCENE-8048 and SOLR-11624 are still open.
>>>
>>> LUCENE-8048 looks like it could make things better in some cases but I
>>> don't think it is required for 7.2, so I don't plan to hold the release on
>>> it.
>>>
>>> SOLR-11624 looks bad, I'll wait for it.
>>>
>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 07:45, Noble Paul <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> +1 this is over due
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 4, 2017 16:38, "Varun Thacker" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 Adrien ! Thanks for taking it up
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ QUEEN
>>>> VIC) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137
>>>>> included in the release. Hoping to commit it on/by Tuesday.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christine
>>>>>
>>>>> From: [email protected] At: 12/01/17 10:11:59
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Lucene/Solr 7.2
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we accumulated a
>>>>> good set of changes, so I think we should release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is one change that I would like to have before building a RC:
>>>>> LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be merged. Please
>>>>> let me know if there are any other changes that should make it to the
>>>>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of
>>>>> building the first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to