[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16287778#comment-16287778 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7996: --------------------------------------------------------- Commit f525ce8fbb30367be2d816be303ee7c1b8d4d0ae in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/master from [~jpountz] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=f525ce8 ] LUCENE-7996: Add a note to the changes in runtime behaviour and to the solr upgrade notes. > Should we require positive scores? > ---------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-7996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7996 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Wish > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > Fix For: master (8.0) > > Attachments: LUCENE-7996.patch, LUCENE-7996.patch, LUCENE-7996.patch > > > Having worked on MAXSCORE recently, things would be simpler if we required > that scores are positive. Practically, this would mean > - forbidding/fixing similarities that may produce negative scores (we have > some of them) > - forbidding things like negative boosts > So I'd be curious to have opinions whether this would be a sane requirement > or whether we need to be able to cope with negative scores eg. because some > similarities that we want to support produce negative scores by design. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org