[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16318012#comment-16318012
 ] 

Yuki Yano commented on SOLR-11597:
----------------------------------

Thanks for your reply, [~malcorn_redhat].

bq. "Nonlinearity" and "activation function" are used more or less 
interchangeably when talking about neural networks. See, e.g., this Stanford 
course, "In other words, each neuron performs a dot product with the input and 
its weights, adds the bias and applies the non-linearity (or activation 
function)". Because the two terms are interchangeable, I'm OK with either being 
used.

I see. Then, I think it is better to keep the name of "nonlinearity" for the 
simplicity.

bq. In my opinion, if this is a route Solr eventually wants to go, I think a 
better strategy would be to just add a dependency on Deeplearning4j. 

That's a great idea :)

> Implement RankNet.
> ------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11597
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11597
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: contrib - LTR
>            Reporter: Michael A. Alcorn
>
> Implement RankNet as described in [this 
> tutorial|https://github.com/airalcorn2/Solr-LTR].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to