[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16318484#comment-16318484
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-11834:
-----------------------------------------
[~munendrasn], thanks for contributing documentation, it's quite important.
But, despite there is no such restriction in code, I'm afraid it works as
described due to some implicit behavior, like top level writer filters subquery
result fields as well.
Have you explicitly tested that top level fl doesn't limit subqueries fields?
> [Ref-Guide] Wrong documentation for subquery transformer
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11834
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11834
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Munendra S N
> Attachments: SOLR-11834.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> Documentation for subquery transformation mentioned that to retrieve the
> field, it should be specified in both fl parameter
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_2/transforming-result-documents.html#subquery-result-fields
> But there is no such restriction in code.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
