[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16350626#comment-16350626
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-8153:
-------------------------------------
also in both cases we are making a tradeoff for all users which may be good but
not for all cases.
perhaps we should fix the general issue? We have {{checkindex -fast}} which
just does does checksum validation and basic stuff like that. Maybe we should
add a {{checkindex -slow}} which is more thorough (even if its like 10x-20x
slower) and doesn't sample in such cases. And use that one mostly in tests. But
we can sample by default to make a reasonable balance of bugs found vs effort.
> checkindex time more than doubles for wikipedia index with recent change
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8153
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Priority: Major
>
> See [http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/checkIndexTime.html]
> Since this is a pretty basic index, seems like something might be wrong?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
