Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-8153:

also in both cases we are making a tradeoff for all users which may be good but 
not for all cases.

perhaps we should fix the general issue? We have {{checkindex -fast}} which 
just does does checksum validation and basic stuff like that. Maybe we should 
add a {{checkindex -slow}} which is more thorough (even if its like 10x-20x 
slower) and doesn't sample in such cases. And use that one mostly in tests. But 
we can sample by default to make a reasonable balance of bugs found vs effort.

> checkindex time more than doubles for wikipedia index with recent change
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-8153
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8153
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Major
> See [http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/checkIndexTime.html]
> Since this is a pretty basic index, seems like something might be wrong?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to