[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16373123#comment-16373123
 ] 

Steve Rowe edited comment on SOLR-11968 at 2/22/18 5:31 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

bq. The posLen of olimpique is 1 but marseille has a posInc of 2. This means 
that there is a hole between olimpique and marseille but posLen doesn't 
indicate this hole.

I think you're wrong, [~jim.ferenczi].

posLen (on olimpique) doesn't have to indicate this hole, because it doesn't 
have anything to do with the gap.

bq. olimpique points to a state that doesn't exist

Aha, this is the crux, I assume: the "state that doesn't exist" isn't actually 
represented by these two attributes, it has to be inferred.  IMHO the 
brokenness here is inability to handle gaps, not in token filters that produce 
them.

bq. I think it's simpler to make sure that stopfilter doesn't break a graph 
like Robert suggested.

AFAICT Robert is suggesting a StopFilter *mode* that would *optionally* remove 
gaps.  IOW its current behavior would remain (and be the default).


was (Author: steve_rowe):
bq. The posLen of olimpique is 1 but marseille has a posInc of 2. This means 
that there is a hole between olimpique and marseille but posLen doesn't 
indicate this hole.

I think you're wrong, [~jim.ferenczi].

bq. olimpique points to a state that doesn't exist

Aha, this is the crux, I assume: the "state that doesn't exist" isn't actually 
represented by these two attributes, it has to be inferred.  IMHO the 
brokenness here is inability to handle gaps, not in token filters that produce 
them.

posLen (on olimpique) doesn't have to indicate this hole, because it doesn't 
have anything to do with the gap.



bq. I think it's simpler to make sure that stopfilter doesn't break a graph 
like Robert suggested.

AFAICT Robert is suggesting a StopFilter *mode* that would *optionally* remove 
gaps.  IOW its current behavior would remain (and be the default).

> Multi-words query time synonyms
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11968
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11968
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: query parsers, Schema and Analysis
>    Affects Versions: master (8.0), 6.6.2
>         Environment: Centos 7.x
>            Reporter: Dominique Béjean
>            Assignee: Steve Rowe
>            Priority: Major
>
> I am trying multi words query time synonyms with Solr 6.6.2 and 
> SynonymGraphFilterFactory filter as explain in this article
>  
> [https://lucidworks.com/2017/04/18/multi-word-synonyms-solr-adds-query-time-support/]
>   
>  My field type is :
> {code:java}
> <fieldType name="textSyn" class="solr.TextField" positionIncrementGap="100">
>      <analyzer type="index">
>        <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.ElisionFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" 
>              articles="lang/contractions_fr.txt"/>
>        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" words="stopwords.txt" 
> ignoreCase="true"/>
>        <filter class="solr.FrenchMinimalStemFilterFactory"/>
>      </analyzer>
>      <analyzer type="query">
>        <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.ElisionFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" 
>              articles="lang/contractions_fr.txt"/>
>        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.SynonymGraphFilterFactory" synonyms="synonyms.txt"
>              ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
>        <filter class="solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" words="stopwords.txt" 
> ignoreCase="true"/>
>        <filter class="solr.FrenchMinimalStemFilterFactory"/>
>      </analyzer>
>    </fieldType>{code}
>  
>  synonyms.txt contains the line :
> {code:java}
> om, olympique de marseille{code}
>  
>  stopwords.txt contains the word 
> {code:java}
> de{code}
>  
>  The order of words in my query has an impact on the generated query in 
> edismax
> {code:java}
> q={!edismax qf='name_text_gp' v=$qq}
>  &sow=false
>  &qq=...{code}
> with "qq=om maillot" or "qq=olympique de marseille maillot", I can see the 
> synonyms expansion. It is working as expected.
> {code:java}
> "parsedquery_toString":"+(((+name_text_gp:olympiqu +name_text_gp:marseil 
> +name_text_gp:maillot) name_text_gp:om))",
>  "parsedquery_toString":"+((name_text_gp:om (+name_text_gp:olympiqu 
> +name_text_gp:marseil +name_text_gp:maillot)))",{code}
> with "qq=maillot om" or "qq=maillot olympique de marseille", I can see the 
> same generated query 
> {code:java}
> "parsedquery_toString":"+((name_text_gp:maillot) (name_text_gp:om))",
>  "parsedquery_toString":"+((name_text_gp:maillot) (name_text_gp:om))",{code}
> I don't understand these generated queries. The first one looks like the 
> synonym expansion is ignored, but the second one shows it is not ignored and 
> only the synonym term is used.
>   
>  When I test the analisys for the field type the synonyms are correctly 
> expanded for both expressions
> {code:java}
> om maillot  
>  maillot om
>  olympique de marseille maillot
>  maillot olympique de marseille{code}
> resulting outputs always include the following terms (obvioulsly not always 
> in the same order)
> {code:java}
> olympiqu om marseil maillot {code}
>  
>  So, i suspect an issue with edismax query parser.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to