[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16373746#comment-16373746
]
Steve Rowe commented on LUCENE-4065:
------------------------------------
bq. i think its totally separate from the whole idea of giving the user a gaps
option.
Maybe change the issue title to that then? (I was lumping it here because it's
a form of token stream corruption)
> FilteringTokenFilter should never corrupt the tokenstream graph
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4065
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4065
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: modules/analysis
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-4065_test.patch
>
>
> Currently removers like stopfilter have an option (true/false) to enable
> position increments.
> If its true: it both inserts gaps where necessary AND propagates gaps down
> the stream.
> If its false: it does neither, which can totally mess up the tokenstream
> graph (e.g. move synonyms to another word).
> There are totally valid natural usecases for false, where you don't want gaps
> because you want phrasequeries to act as if the word was never actually there.
> But 'not inserting gaps' is separate from proper propagation of existing gaps.
> So I think we should provide an option (either fix 'false' or make it an
> enum), where you still get a legit tokenstream and dont totally screw it up,
> but you simply omit gaps.
> See LUCENE-3848 for more information (Where we at least fixed this case to
> not begin the tokenstream with posinc=0)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
